Urban Planning


Urban Planning09 Jan 2007 09:53 am

Last year I reported on Planetizen’s Top Ten planning issues of 2005 and speculated on what the 2006 issues would be. I pegged one of the five issues that Planetizen just published as the top issues of 2006: the bursting of the housing bubble. Here’s the list:

  • Property Rights: The Kelo vs. New London backlash
  • Downtown Redevelopment and the problem of gentrification
  • The Katrina Cottage and the promise of prefab housing
  • The bursting of the housing bubble

and my own personal favorite:

  • Green building going mainstream

It’s too early to predict the top planning issues of 2007 - I’ll attempt that later this year.

Transportation and Urban Planning16 May 2006 05:00 pm

Suppose the local transit authority announced a hefty fare increase. Suppose you are upset and would like to let them know that you feel a fare increase is unfair. Suppose you decide to speak at a public meeting. Fine idea, perfectly valid. Nobody is excited about paying higher fares. Here are a few things to keep in mind:

A) Anybody will understand that you’re frustrated, that doesn’t exempt you from being civilized.
B) Trust me, you will get a better reception and consideration when you speak or write respectfully rather than spewing off one insult after another. Because, honestly, when was the last time that worked for you?
C) Don’t cut each other off mid-sentence, you’re a grown-up and I am sure want to be treated like one, so act like one. If I hear one more time how disrespectful young kids are today, I will dedicate a whole blog rant to the topic of rude self-righteous adults. Some of the most civilized & respectful people I have seen at public hearings are high school students.
D) Don’t start crying (see C about being a grown-up).
E) A transit agency can’t be all things to all people. Yes, you have a right to be heard, but sometimes the answer is going to be that it can’t be done.
F) All the improvements people want to see cost money, if you are against a fare increase, many of those are unlikely to happen - ever.
G) People (native English speakers, I might add) complain about lack of signage in languages other than English to serve immigrant communities. I’m sorry, is it really so outragously preposterous to expect that immigrants to this country get a basic grasp on the language? People who have lived here for several years and don’t speak enough English to read signs should get language lessons, not be catered to by having everything translated into their language.
H) If you’re going to compare a public agency with a private business in terms of operating efficiencies etc, you have to concede that private businesses have the authority to raise prices without your input or an analysis of how that would affect low-income folks or the environment (and they constantly do so, have the prices of cars not gone up? milk? bread? clothes? Where is the public outrage?).
I) The public transit authority is not the cause of nor the solution for low minimum wages and social security payments.
J) Even if it can sometimes appear that way, public officials are not in the business of making your life miserable.
K) And, as always, think before you speak. Well presented constructive criticism and arguments are always welcome.

The events alluded to in this blog entry are not fictitious. Any similarity to actual events at recent public meetings is entirely intentional.

Urban Planning23 Mar 2006 05:33 pm

Planetizen editors put together their Top Ten planning issues of 2005 in the United States including links to a few relevant articles for each topic:

  • Kelo vs. New London - Eminent domain
  • Hurricane Katrina
  • America’s failing infrastructure
  • The McMansion backlash
  • Condofication
  • Google democratizes mapping
  • Wi-Fi networks and economic development
  • The new suburbanism and creative class debates
  • Peak Oil and planning for alternative energy
  • The high cost of free parking

I wonder what will be on the 2006 list? A bursting housing bubble or a continued housing shortage? A new focus on planning for disaster prevention and response (earthquakes, tornadoes, terrorist attacks, climate change)? The return of nuclear energy? A new era for skyscrapers? Water wars?

Transportation and Urban Planning09 Jan 2006 04:22 pm

We drive on parkways, park in driveways and more often than not parking is a pain. Too little of it and we either spent way too much time or money to park, too much of it and it destroys any city’s atmosphere. Planners, architects, business owners and drivers constantly argue over parking.
Too bad that parks, our beautiful recreational oases, and parking share the same word even though they have nothing in common. Or do they? A group of creative folks in San Francisco set out to create a park in a metered street parking spot.
Turns out that parking does not exclusively apply to vehicles. So, why not park a park? Or “pahk a pahk”, as they say in Boston. Here a link to the project including do-it-yourself instructions.

Urban Planning25 Aug 2005 05:59 pm

While Americans are building larger and larger homes (we’re talking 4,800 sf mansions), a group of German students figured out a way to live perfectly fine on 81 square feet, or should I say in 729 cubic feet. A few cubes are actually being built as student housing in Munich. The article is in German, but if you click on the three images, it will open up a slide show of 15 pictures, enough to get a pretty good idea. Very cool, although certainly not for the claustrophic.